King Lear Clear Vision
King Lear - Clear VisionOUTLINE
I. Introduction
A. Issue of sight and its relevance to clear vision
B. Statement of thesis: Lear’s failure to understand that clear vision is not derived solely from physical sight is the principal cause of his demise, while Gloucester learns to achieve clear vision, and consequently avoids a fate similar to Lear’s.
II. Lear’s Lack of Insight
A. Banishment of Kent
B. Condemnation of relationship with Cordelia
III. Gloucester’s Lack of Insight
A. Gullibility towards Edgar
IV. Contrast of Gloucester and Lear’s Vision
A. Meeting at the cliffs of Dover
V. Conclusion
A. Restatement of thesis
B. Clear vision is not a result from sight alone
CLEAR VISION IN KING LEAR
In Shakespeare’s classic tragedy, King Lear, the issue of sight and its relevance to clear vision is a recurring theme. Shakespeare’s principal means of portraying this theme is through the characters of Lear and Gloucester. Although Lear can physically see, he is blind in the sense that he lacks insight, understanding, and direction. In contrast, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the type of vision that Lear lacks. It is evident from these two characters that clear vision is not derived solely from physical sight. Lear’s failure to understand this is the principal cause of his demise, while Gloucester learns to achieve clear vision, and consequently avoids a fate similar to Lear’s.
Throughout most of the play, Lear’s vision is clouded by his lack of insight. Since he cannot see into other people’s characters, he can never identify them for who they truly are. When Cordelia angers Lear, Kent tries to reason with him but is unsuccessful because he is too stubborn to remain open-minded. Lear responds to Kent’s opposition with, “Out of my sight!,” to which Kent responds, “See better, Lear; and let me still remain” (894). Here, Lear is saying he never wants to see Kent again, but he can never truly see him for who he is. Kent is only trying to do what is best for Lear, but Lear can not see that. Kent’s vision is not clouded, as is Lear’s, and he knows that he can remain near Lear as long as he is in disguise. Lear’s vision is also marred by his lack of direction in life, and his poor foresight, his inability to predict the consequences of his actions. He cannot look far enough into the future to see the consequences of his actions. This, in addition to his lack of insight into other people, condemns his relationship with his most beloved daughter, Cordelia. When Lear asks his daughters who loves him most, he already assumes that Cordelia has the most love for him. However, when Cordelia says, “…I love your majesty / According to my bond; nor more nor less”, Lear cannot see what these words really mean (893)....
To view the complete essay, you be registered.