Nanotechnology
NanotechnologyCurtis Shephard
Nanotechnology: Immortality or total annihilation?
Technology has evolved from ideals once seen as unbelievable to common everyday instruments.
Computers that used to occupy an entire room are now the size of notebooks. The human race has always
pushed for technological advances working at the most efficient level, perhaps, the molecular level. The
developments and progress in artificial intelligence and molecular technology have spawned a new form
of technology; Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology could give the human race eternal life, or it could cause
total annihilation.
The idea of nanotech was conceived by a man named K. Eric Drexler (Stix 94), which he defines
as “Technology based on the manipulation of individual atoms and molecules to build structures to
complex atomic specifications (Drexler, “Engines” 288).” The technology which Drexler speaks of will be
undoubtedly small, in fact, nano- structures will only measure 100 nanometers, or a billionth of a meter
(Stix 94).
Being as small as they are, nanostructures require fine particles that can only be seen with the
STM, or Scanning Tunneling Microscope (Dowie 4). Moreover the STM allows the scientists to not only
see things at the molecular level, but it can pick up and move atoms as well (Port 128). Unfortunately the
one device that is giving nanoscientists something to work with is also one of the many obstacles
restricting the development of nanotech. The STM has been regarded as too big to ever produce nanotech
structures (Port 128). Other scientists have stated that the manipulation of atoms, which nanotech relies
on, ignores atomic reality. Atoms simply don’t fit together in ways which nanotech intends to use them
(Garfinkel 105). The problems plaguing the progress of nanotech has raised many questions among the
scientific community concerning it’s validity. The moving of atoms, the gathering of information, the
restrictions of the STM, all restrict nanotech progress. And until these questions are answered, nanotech
is regarded as silly (Stix 98).
But the nanotech optimists are still out there. They contend that the progress made by a team at
IBM who was able to write letters and draw pictures atom by atom actually began the birth of nanotech
(Darling 49). These same people answer the scientific questions by replying that a breakthrough is not
needed, rather the science gained must be applied (DuCharme 33). In fact, Drexler argues that the
machines exist, trends are simply working on building better ones (”Unbounding” 24). Drexler continues
by stating that the machines he spoke about in “Engines of Creation” published in 1986 should be
developed early in the 21st century (”Unbounding” 116).
However many scientists still argue that because nanotech has produced absolutely nothing
physical, it should be regarded as science fiction (Garfinkel 111). Secondly, nano-doubters rely on
scientific fact to condemn nanotech. For example it is argued that we are very far away...
To view the complete essay, you be registered.