Why hamlet is not fit to rule
Why hamlet is not fit to ruleWhy Hamlet Is Not Fit To Rule
Actions judged without empathy implore bias at the
deepest root. Seldom, life experience equals the paradox of
participant observation with the magnitude and malice of
Shakespeare's Hamlet. Although Hamlet tragically suffers
misfortune from the volition of others, his character
measures in deed and thought. From the scant background on
Hamlet's youth to the words of Hamlet himself, ample
evidence shows Hamlet unsuited to lead. A good man of
sterling character but a casualty of extraordinary morass,
the Prince's impending doom is inevitable. Hamlet
demonstrates all men culpable. While commendable men may
remain fragile, a leader will elude encumbrance at all cost
to ensure leadership. Hence, not all leaders are virtuous.
Hamlet's virtues subdue his resolve to lead. Granted the
opportunity, the play establishes the three following
reasons Hamlet can not lead a country: a sheltered life, the
deep love for his parents and an overpowering encountering
with the supernatural.
The play shows no intimation of Hamlet either waiting
or longing to be king. By all accounts he appears content as
Prince. Likewise, one can venture his childhood balanced and
happy. Hamlet laments the skull of Yorick, "Alas, poor /
Yorick! I knew him, Horatio--a fellow of infinite / jest, of
most excellent fancy. He hath bore me on his back a thousand
times,.." (5.1.190-193). Also, he speaks highly of his
father and possesses a profound closeness to his mother.
This shows remarkable parenting, producing an eminently
loving, respectful and faithful son. However, the sheltering
of his life does not strike to advantage. Fueled by the
departure of his protected childhood, Hamlet's temper
severely distorts his outlook, philosophy and reasoning. The
vast contrast from guarded youth to sudden misfortune
devastates the Prince's world, as Hamlet's probity and
grievance polarize his emotions. Moreover, preceding the
ages of approximately twenty-five to thirty, Hamlet had
never experienced genuine tragedy. Deducing these factors
offers a starting point to further analyze Hamlet's
character.
In addition, Shakespeare conceals a crevasse of mystery
for the ostensible change in Queen Gertrude. Conceivably.
the Queen enjoyed quarters with Claudius while the late King
Hamlet fought distant, gallant battles, making a puissant
formula for seduction. Regardless, as time forces Hamlet to
reckon the death of his father and the incestuous marriage
of his mother and uncle, nascent stages of insanity appear
when he can not voice his violated and broken heart. For
example, concerning his mother's swift marriage, Hamlet
remarks, "It is not, nor it cannot come to good./ But break
my heart, for I must hold my tongue" (1.2.163,164). His
internal confinement eventually explodes. Yet, Hamlet's
actions deserve a compassionate view inasmuch as his burdens
unfairly seek him out. Shakespeare ironically limns Hamlet a
courageous yet injured character having no recourse for
recovery, too sensitively lost in the real world. A...
To view the complete essay, you be registered.